Here's his view:
Nichols believes that the overtime violations have always existed, but that when the overtime regulations were rewritten in 2004, more people started paying attention.The parts in bold are a good short-hand summary of what happened. For my earlier thoughts you can see my posts here and here.The original draft of the changes placed significant restrictions on who received overtime. But the new regulations were less aggressive.
During the highly public process, though, many people took a close look at the law. After the new regulations came out, some companies reclassified employees so they would now be eligible for overtime, Nichols said. Those employees wondered why, if they are suddenly eligible for overtime, they weren't paid for it for years going back if their jobs didn't change, he said. That, in turn, fueled more claims. (Emphasis added).